Responsibilities in gambling harm prevention and reduction
Evidence from recently regulated licensed markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cgs226Keywords:
gambling, Harm prevention, harm reduction, licensing, responsibilityAbstract
Gambling harm prevention and reduction consists of a range of upstream and downstream solutions. Responsibilities for implementing and ensuring these tasks falls across a range of actors, including policymakers, regulators, health professionals and industry. Increased harms caused by online gambling necessitate new regulatory measures, and potentially new responsibilities for their implementation. The current study uses key informant interview data (N=10) conducted in four jurisdictions that have recently introduced a license-based online gambling market (Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Ontario). Our aim was to identify what kind of responsibilities for harm prevention and reduction emerge in competitive online markets, to whom responsibility for these tasks is assigned, and what kind of barriers to harm prevention exist across responsibilities. Our analysis shows that most universal responsibilities are assigned to policy makers and regulators. Selective measures aiming at those who gamble, are largely implemented in collaboration between regulators and industry. Indicated and treatment-focused measures are the shared responsibility of treatment professionals, regulators and industry. The main barriers to effective harm prevention related to conflicting interests, industry power, lacking harm prevention resources, lacking centralisation and offshore provision. We argue that improved harm prevention would require balancing existing asymmetries that relate to power, responsibilities and prioritisations.
References
Akçayır, M., Nicoll, F., Baxter, D. G., & Palmer, Z. S. (2022). Whose responsibility is it to prevent or reduce gambling harm? A mapping review of current empirical research. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(3), 1516-1536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00459-x
Alexius, S. (2017). Assigning responsibility for gambling-related harm: scrutinizing processes of direct and indirect consumer responsibilization of gamblers in Sweden. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(6), 462-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2017.1321739
Bankel, R., & Solér, C. (2025). Embedded-embodied consumer experiences and the limits of responsibilization theory. Social Responsibility Journal, 21(4), 793-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2024-0252
Berret, S., Marionneau, V., Sievänen, R., & Nikkinen, J. (2024). Institutional investment in addictive industries: an important commercial determinant of health. Frontiers in public health, 12, 1409648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1409648
Borrell, J. (2008). The ‘Public Accountability Approach’: suggestions for a framework to characterise, compare, inform and evaluate gambling regulation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6(2), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-007-9131-3
Casey, D. (2024). Reproducing responsible gambling through codes of conduct: the role of trade associations and codes of conduct in shaping risk regulation. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 15(2), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.50
Fiedler, I., Kairouz, S., & Reynolds, J. (2021). Corporate social responsibility vs. financial interests: The case of responsible gambling programs. Journal of Public Health, 29(4), 993-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01219-w
Forsström, D., & Cisneros Örnberg, J. (2018). Responsible gambling in practice: A case study of views and practices of Swedish oriented gambling companies. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 36(2), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072518802492
Goedecke, K., Spångberg, J., Svensson, J. (2023). License to Gamble: Discursive Perspectives on the 2019 Reregulation of the Swedish Gambling Market. Critical Gambling Studies, 4(2), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.29173/cgs157
Gray, H. M., LaPlante, D. A., Abarbanel, B., & Bernhard, B. J. (2021a). Gamblers’ perceptions of stakeholder responsibility for minimizing gambling harm. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19(4), 891-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-0056-4
Gray, H. M., Louderback, E. R., LaPlante, D. A., Abarbanel, B., & Bernhard, B. J. (2021b). Gamblers’ beliefs about responsibility for minimizing gambling harm: Associations with problem gambling screening and gambling involvement. Addictive Behaviors, 114, 106660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106660
Hancock L., Schellinck T., & Schrans T. (2008). Gambling and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Re-defining industry and state roles on duty of care, host responsibility and risk management. Policy and Society, 27(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.07.005
Hancock, L., & Smith, G. (2017a). Critiquing the Reno model i-iv international influence on regulators and governments (2004–2015)—the distorted reality of ‘responsible gambling’. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(6), 1151–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9746-y.
Kyngäs, H. (2019). Inductive content analysis. In H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen & M. Kääriäinen (Eds.), The application of content analysis in nursing science research (pp. 13-21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_2
Livingstone, C., & Rintoul, A. (2020). Moving on from responsible gambling: a new discourse is needed to prevent and minimise harm from gambling. Public Health, 184, 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.018
Livingstone, C. (2023). The End of 'Responsible Gambling': Reinvigorating Gambling Studies. Critical Gambling Studies, 4(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29173/cgs164
Marionneau, V., Ruohio, H., & Karlsson, N. (2023). Gambling harm prevention and harm reduction in online environments: a call for action. Harm Reduction Journal, 20, 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00828-4
Marko, S., Thomas, S. L., Robinson, K., & Daube, M. (2022). Gamblers’ perceptions of responsibility for gambling harm: a critical qualitative inquiry. BMC Public Health, 22, 725. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13109-9
Miller, H. E., Thomas, S. L., Smith, K. M., & Robinson, P. (2015). Surveillance, responsibility and control: an analysis of government and industry discourses about “problem” and “responsible” gambling. Addiction Research & Theory, 24(2), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2015.1094060
Parker, C., Albarrán-Torres, C., Briggs, C., Burgess, J., Carah, N., Andrejevic, M., Angus, D., & Obeid, A. (2024). Addressing the accountability gap: gambling advertising and social media platform responsibilities. Addiction Research & Theory, 32(4), 312-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2023.2269852
Reynolds, J., Kairouz, S., Ilacqua, S., & French, M. (2020). Responsible gambling: a scoping review. Critical Gambling Studies, 1(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.29173/cgs42
Rintoul, A. (2019). Modernising harm prevention for gambling in Australia: International lessons for public health policy and improved regulation of gambling. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22616.52480
Ukhova, D., Marionneau, V., Nikkinen, J., & Wardle, H. (2024). Public health approaches to gambling: a global review of legislative trends. The Lancet Public Health, 9(1), e57-e67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00221-9
Velasco, V., Scattola, P., Gavazzeni, L., Marchesi, L., Nita, I. E., & Giudici, G. (2021). Prevention and harm reduction interventions for adult gambling at the local level: an umbrella review of empirical evidence. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(18), 9484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189484
Wardle, H., Degenhardt, L., Marionneau, V., Reith, G., Livingstone, C., Sparrow, M., Trans, L.T., Biggar, B., Bunn, C., Farrell, M., & Saxena, S. (2024). The Lancet Public Health commission on gambling. The Lancet Public Health, 9(11), e950-e994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00167-1
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-10-28 (2)
- 2025-10-28 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Virve Marionneau, Mette Kivistö, Nina Karlsson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Critical Gambling Studies.
