Time to Shuffle the Deck
Recommendations to Improve Gender Representation at Gambling Studies Conferences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cgs222Keywords:
gender, gender disparity, gambling, gambling studies, conferences, symposia, womenAbstract
The underrepresentation of women speakers at academic conferences in the gambling studies field is historic and pervasive yet the pressing issue of gender disparity in the field has yet to be adequately acknowledged or addressed. In 2023, an International Forum, hosted by Research And Networking for Gambling Early-career Scholars (RANGES) brought together ten early career researchers in the gambling studies field, all women, from varied research environments and disciplinary backgrounds. The International Forum aimed to answer the question: How can gambling studies conferences improve gender representation and become more inclusive and equitable? The result is this commentary which constitutes a set of recommendations related to gambling studies conferences designed to be implemented broadly as a form of collective action that will (1) contribute to the development of a shared understanding and awareness of the pressing issue of gender disparity; (2) provide actionable pathways for change; and (3) trigger a systemic and comprehensive change in the face of ongoing gender disparity with the goal of creating a more equitable, diverse and inclusive research field.
References
Aldrich, M. C., Cust, A. E., & Raynes-Greenow, C. (2019). Gender equity in epidemiology: A policy brief. Annals of Epidemiology, 35, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.03.010
Al-Gazali, L., Valian, V., Barres, B., Wu, L. A., Andrei, E. Y., Handelsman, J., & Husu, L. (2013). Scientists of the world speak up for equality. Nature, 495(7439), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/495035a
Arora, A., Kaur, Y., Dossa, F., Nisenbaum, R., Little, D., & Baxter, N. N. (2020). Proportion of female speakers at academic medical conferences across multiple specialties and regions. JAMA Network Open, 3(9), e2018127. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18127
Atir, S., & Ferguson, M. J. (2018). How gender determines the way we speak about professionals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(28), 7278–7283. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805284115
Biggs, J., Hawley, P. H., & Biernat, M. (2018). The academic conference as a chilly climate for women: Effects of gender representation on experiences of sexism, coping responses, and career intentions. Sex Roles, 78, 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0800-9
Borg, S. (2015). The benefits of attending ELT conferences. ELT Journal, 69(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu045
Casadevall, A. (2015). Achieving speaker gender equity at the American Society for Microbiology General Meeting. mBio, 6(4), 10.1128/mbio.01146-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01146-15
Casadevall, A., & Handelsman, J. (2014). The presence of female conveners correlates with a higher proportion of female speakers at scientific symposia. mBio, 5(1), 10.1128/mbio.00846-13. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00846-13
Coe, I. R., Wiley, R., & Bekker, L. G. (2019). Organisational best practices towards gender equality in science and medicine. The Lancet, 393(10171), 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33188-X
Corona-Sobrino, C., García-Melón, M., Poveda-Bautista, R., & González-Urango, H. (2020). Closing the gender gap at academic conferences: A tool for monitoring and assessing academic events. PLoS One, 15(12), e0243549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243549
Daniels, A. K. (1987). Invisible work. Social Problems, 34(5), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/800538
Drury, B. J., & Kaiser, C. R. (2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12083
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007, September). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press. https://hbr.org/2007/09/women-and-the-labyrinth-of-leadership
Else, H. (2019). How to banish manels and manferences from scientific meetings. Nature, 573(7773), 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02658-6
Ennis, G., & Tofa, M. (2019). Collective impact: A review of the peer-reviewed research. Australian Social Work, 73(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2019.1602662
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2016). Gender equity. https://eige.europa.eu/thesaurus/terms/1175
Farid, H., Luercio, M., Kanjee, Z., Parikh, M., Liu, K. J., Fraiche, A. M., & Huang, G. (2022). Promoting gender equity in virtual meetings. The Permanente Journal, 26(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/22.016
Files, J. A., Mayer, A. P., Ko, M. G., Friedrich, P., Jenkins, M., Bryan, M. J., Vegunta, S., Wittich, C. M., Lyle, M. A., Melikian, R., Duston, T., Chang, Y. H., & Hayes, S. N. (2017). Speaker introductions at internal medicine grand rounds: Forms of address reveal gender bias. Journal of Women's Health, 26(5), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6044
Fournier, L. E., Hopping, G. C., Zhu, L., Perez-Pinzon, M. A., Ovbiagele, B., McCullough, L. D., & Sharrief, A. Z. (2020). Females are less likely invited speakers to the international stroke conference: Time’s up to address sex disparity. Stroke, 51(2), 674–678. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027016
Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2012, January 6). Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/channeling_change_making_collective_impact_work
Hinsley, A., Sutherland, W. J., & Johnston, A. (2017). Men ask more questions than women at a scientific conference. PloS One, 12(10), e0185534. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185534
Isbell, L. A., Young, T. P., & Harcourt, A. H. (2012). Stag parties linger: Continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline. PloS One, 7(11), e49682. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049682
Jones, T. M., Fanson, K. V., Lanfear, R., Symonds, M. R., & Higgie, M. (2014). Gender differences in conference presentations: A consequence of self-selection? PeerJ, 2, e627. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.627
Kaplan, A. (2022). “Just let it pass by and it will fall on some woman”: Invisible work in the labor market. Gender & Society, 36(6), 838–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432221128544
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact
Kalejta, R. F., & Palmenberg, A. C. (2017). Gender parity trends for invited speakers at four prominent virology conference series. Journal of Virology, 91(16), 10.1128/jvi.00739-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00739-17
Malisch, J. L., Harris, B. N., Sherrer, S. M., Lewis, K. A., Shepherd, S. L., McCarthy, P. C., Spott, J. L., Karam, E. P., Moustaid-Moussa, N., Calarco, J. M., Ramalingam, L., Talley, A. E., Cañas-Carrell, J. E., Ardon-Dryer, K., Weiser, D. A., Bernal, X. E., & Deitloff, J. (2020). In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15378–15381. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010636117
Martin, J. L. (2014). Ten simple rules to achieve conference speaker gender balance. PLOS Computational Biology, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003903
Martinez, E. D., Botos, J., Dohoney, K. M., Geiman, T. M., Kolla, S. S., Olivera, A., Qiu, Y., Rayasam, G. V., & Cohen‐Fix, O. (2007). Falling off the academic bandwagon: Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition. EMBO reports, 8(11), 977–981. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401110
Monson, E., Ng, K., Sibbick, H., Berbiche, D., & Morvannou, A. (2023). Gender disparity in prestigious speaking roles: A study of 10 years of international conference programming in the field of gambling studies. PLOS One, 18(6), e0286803. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286803
Oleschuk, M. (2020). Gender equity considerations for tenure and promotion during COVID-19. Canadian Review of Sociology, 57(3), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12295
Onyeador, I. N., Hudson, S. T. J., & Lewis, N. A. (2021). Moving beyond implicit bias training: Policy insights for increasing organizational diversity. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220983840
Pell, A. N. (1996). Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in academia. Journal of Animal Science, 74(11), 2843–2848. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.74112843x
Sanchez, M. E., Hypolite, L. I., Newman, C. B., & Cole, D. G. (2019). Black women in STEM: The need for intersectional supports in professional conference spaces. Journal of Negro Education, 88(3), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.3.0297
Sardelis, S., & Drew, J. A. (2016). Not “pulling up the ladder”: Women who organize conference symposia provide greater opportunities for women to speak at conservation conferences. PloS One, 11(7), e0160015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160015
Sardelis, S., Oester, S., & Liboiron, M. (2017). Ten strategies to reduce gender inequality at scientific conferences. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 231. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00231
Schroeder, J., Dugdale, H. L., Radersma, R., Hinsch, M., Buehler, D. M., Saul, J., Porter, L., Liker, A., De Cauwer, I., Johnson, P. J., Santure, A. W., Griffin, A. S., Bolund, E., Ross, L., Webb, T. J., Feulner, P. G., Winney, I., Szulkin, M., Komdeur, J., … & Horrocks, N. P. (2013). Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26(9), 2063–2069. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12198
Skiles, M., Yang, E., Reshef, O., Muñoz, D. R., Cintron, D., Lind, M. L., Rush, A., Perez Calleja, P., Nerenberg, R., Armani, A., Faust, K. M. & Kumar, M. (2022). Conference demographics and footprint changed by virtual platforms. Nature Sustainability, 5(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00823-2
Sleeman, K. E., Koffman, J., & Higginson, I. J. (2019). Leaky pipeline, gender bias, self-selection or all three? A quantitative analysis of gender balance at an international palliative care research conference. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 9(2), 146-148. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001211
Stadnyk, T., & Black, K. (2020). Lost ground: Female academics face an uphill battle in post-pandemic world. Hydrological Processes, 34(15), 3400–3402. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13803
Tulloch, A. I. (2020). Improving sex and gender identity equity and inclusion at conservation and ecology conferences. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(10), 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1255-x
Tower, L. E., & Latimer, M. (2016). Cumulative disadvantage: Effects of early career childcare issues on faculty research travel. Affilia, 31(3), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109915622527
Vallence, A. M., Hinder, M. R., & Fujiyama, H. (2019). Data-driven selection of conference speakers based on scientific impact to achieve gender parity. PLoS One, 14(7), e0220481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220481
Wehi, P. M., Beggs, J. R., & Anderson, B. J. (2019). Leadership and diversity in the New Zealand Ecological Society. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 43(2), 3368. https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol.43.16
Worthen, M. G. (2011). College student experiences with an LGBTQ ally training program: A mixed methods study at a university in the southern United States. Journal of LGBT Youth, 8(4), 332–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2011.608024

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eva Monson, Nicole Arsenault, Annie-Claude Savard, Adèle Morvannou, Carling Baxter, Tara Hahmann, Catherine Hitch, Viktorija Kesaite, Katie Palmer du Preez, Andrée-Anne Légaré

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Critical Gambling Studies.